Animal
Robert E. Horseman, DDS
"Today," the instructor announced, "we will coat a rotating
drum with some lampblack, attach some electrodes to a frog's leg and see what
happens when we apply electric current through the electrodes." It
was shortly after that I became a sort of semi-supporter of animal rights
groups. Physiology labs have been doing this sort of thing for ages and
all that ever happens is that the frog's leg predictably twitches when the
current is applied. The fact that a record is made on the rotating drum
in the name of Science, does not justify the indignity in the slightest.
The only thing more traumatic from an apprehensive frog's point of view would
be that the experiments take place in a French lab.
You could look at that drum from then to graduation and come to only one
conclusion--duhh. One small step for mankind, but a real bummer for
generations of frogs who, if my worst fears are realized, will someday arise
and wreak their vengeance on all of us who participated, albeit unwillingly,
in these seemingly irrelevant experiments.
Even more horrendous were those hours in zoology labs where I was forced at
gun point to dissect not only a frog, but an acanthus shark and, God forgive
me, an actual cat. When you have many assorted amphibian parts scattered
over your desk, fingers slimed with what passes for frog blood and realize
that from all this will come no major boost to your dental career, you know
that you will never watch Kermit again with any peace of mind. No wonder
he claims it's hard being green, man, it's downright fatal!
The possibility that put-upon animals may rebel someday was illustrated a few
years ago in a documentary made by a rotund English director named Alfred
Hitchcock. His film, called "The Birds," was pitched
for weeks prior to its showing with the ungrammatical, but chillingly
prophetic warning that "The Birds is coming!" And they did,
too. Millions of blackbirds, ravens, crows and gulls, setting aside for
the moment whatever avian jealousies that had divided them, banded together to
terrorize an entire town and one hapless inhabitant, Tippi Hedron, in
particular.
It was not a pretty sight as the maddened creatures darkened the sky,
speckling targets of opportunity below them and dominating the sound track
with their demands that a government of the birds and by the birds would be for
the birds and should be implemented immediately. I forget exactly how all this
ended, except that the birds' agents were alarmed to observe their clients
running into each other at speeds exceeding 200 miles an hour, making the
likelihood of a sequel very iffy.
Tippi Hedron, as I
recall, emerged disheveled, but otherwise intact, made several more
forgettable movies and eventually gave birth to Melanie Griffith who
marginally matured to marry Don Johnson--twice. Tippi will be most
remembered for making it more acceptable for women with comical names like
Tuesday Weld, Whoopi Goldberg and Tipper Gore to appear in public without
embarrassment.
An uprising of birds is one thing, but an even more ominous possibility is the
growing discontent amongst the canine population. For years, dental
research involving dogs has been providing us with valuable information, but
ignoring the really important questions of why they find it necessary to
urinate so indiscriminately and why they can display so much unconditional
affection to really bad persons.
From the dogs' point of view, no amount of stick throwing, scratching behind
the ears and succulent cans of Kennel Ration is going to make up for their
discomfiture in the laboratory. Dogs are already ticked off at not being
given opposable thumbs on their paws. Because of this oversight, even
doorknobs, which represent Freedom to them, become objects of unmanageable
hi-tech machinery, necessitating much humiliating and obsequious toadying.
It would not surprise me a bit to learn that death squads of Rottweilers,
Dobermans and pit bulls have been secretly formed to recruit poodles, Yorkies
and beagles with the goal of plotting our comeuppance.
What's worse, one of our own, a dentist from Pennsylvania in the early days of
World War II, had a brilliant idea to bring the Japanese conflict to an early
conclusion. He's the one who came up with the notion of attaching small
incendiary bombs to bats and dropping them out of airplanes to start the
mother of all fires. Considerable thought and $2 million of the
taxpayers' money went into this scheme and after a couple of years of bat
sitting and the formation of guano-intensive policing details, the War
Department was ready for a run-through with little dummy bombs.
The kamikaze bats, who discovered too late that their names were on the duty roster, were refrigerated to stop their whining, the bombs were attached and the whole frigid flock flown in a B-26 to 5,000 feet for the test.
Alas, most of the bats, too groggy from their involuntary hibernation, augered
straight in and died on impact. Back to the drawing board. Finally, in
1944, after a fire was set accidentally to some of our own facilities by bats
with a poorly developed sense of allegiance, the project was canceled. The
legends that are passed on by bats from one generation to the next, fix the
blame for this whole fiasco squarely on the dentist who initiated the idea.
So you can see that our relations with the animal kingdom are tenuous at best
and now that we're waging all-out war on the viruses and bacteria that hang out
like homeless squatters in our offices, we will have managed to antagonize
nearly every living species. Watch your back.
Originally published in the Journal of the California Dental Association, 02/93.